Skip to content

How to Track Whether AI Engines Cite You

Last verified: 2026-09-24. E-GEO rewrites pages so answer engines can cite them. It does not ship its own citation tracker. This page covers how to measure the result: the free method we use ourselves, the open-source trackers, and the hosted tools.

Rankings in Google tell you little about AI answers. An AI engine gives one synthesized answer and names a handful of sources. Your question is binary: for the queries your customers ask, is your site one of the named sources? Without measuring that, any GEO work is guesswork.

Option 1 — A fixed query set (free, what we use)

Section titled “Option 1 — A fixed query set (free, what we use)”

This is the method behind our public case study:

  1. Pick 10 queries your customers actually ask. Mix branded (<your product> github), category (best open source <category> tools) and problem queries (how to <job your product does>).
  2. Run them against one engine on a fixed schedule (we use Perplexity’s API weekly) and record, per query: whether you are mentioned, which competitors are mentioned, and which source domains are cited.
  3. Store every run as a dated snapshot. Discard runs with empty answers — a failed API call looks like “not cited”.
  4. Read the trend, not a single run. One snapshot can move by 1–2 queries on noise alone.

The cited source domains matter as much as your score: they are the sites you need to be mentioned on (see how to get cited by Perplexity).

Tool What it does (per its README) License
geo-optimizer-skill geo citations checks real answer engines for your brand and domain; geo monitor / geo track keep a history MIT
Elmo Self-hostable tracking of mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Grok and AI Overviews MIT
GEORank GEO ranking and optimization platform Apache-2.0

Expect to bring your own API keys and a machine to run them on. Full list: open-source GEO tools directory.

If you would rather not run anything, hosted tools track many prompts across engines and show trends in a dashboard:

  • Profound — enterprise AI visibility platform.
  • Peec AI — AI search analytics for marketing teams and agencies.
  • Otterly — AI search monitoring with an API.
  • Rankscale — AI search rank tracking with an API.
  • LLM Pulse — AI visibility tracking with API access.
  • AIclicks — AI visibility tracking; plans listed from $59/month.

We have not benchmarked these against each other. Try two on the same 10 queries before committing.

Tracking only helps if it changes what you publish. The loop:

  1. Measure with any option above.
  2. Pick the losers: queries where competitors are cited and you are not.
  3. Fix the page that should answer that query. For one page:
Terminal window
pip install egeo
egeo optimize your-page.md --query "best open source geo tools"

Or feed the whole tracker report to egeo fix-gaps, which maps every uncited query to its page through project.yaml and rewrites each losing page once (pip install -U egeo, v2.1.0+).

  1. Get mentioned on the cited sources for that query — on-page fixes alone rarely flip a citation.
  2. Re-measure on the next scheduled run, and keep the dated snapshots.

It is the same loop we run on E-GEO itself; the method and snapshots are in the case study.